UK Updates

MHRA Clarifies UKCA & CE Mark Rules: What MedTech manufacturers should know- CE-Marked Devices Still Accepted Until 2030, UKCA-Marked Devices Must Follow UK-Specific eIFU Rules, CE Compliance equals UK Market Access

MHRA Updates Clinical Investigation Guidance

The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has released updated guidance for conducting clinical investigations of medical devices in Great Britain. These changes reflect the UK’s post-Brexit regulatory evolution and aim to streamline submissions, clarify investigator responsibilities, and reinforce safety standards.

Key Updates

Submission Process: What’s Required

Sponsors must submit applications electronically via the Integrated Research Application System (IRAS). The MHRA expects sponsors to follow a suite of supporting documents, including:

Final Thoughts

As the UK continues to shape its independent regulatory identity, the MHRA’s updated clinical investigation guidance reflects a commitment to clarity, safety, and innovation. The updated guidance from the MHRA about clinical investigations shows a focus on being clear, safe, and innovative. For sponsors and consultants, this is an opportunity to refine processes, reduce delays, and ensure compliance with evolving standards.

UK REACH Consultation: Share Your Thoughts on Registration Deadlines

The UK government is asking for feedback on extending the registration deadlines for chemicals under UK REACH. This comes after delays in starting the new Alternative Transitional Registration model (ATRm).

This is a critical opportunity for industry stakeholders to shape the future of chemical regulation in the UK.

Why It Matters:

Sushvin Consultancy’s Perspective
At Sushvin Consultancy, we understand the importance of national sector strategies. For developers, regulators, and investors looking at the UK market, now is the time to:

ABHI will respond on behalf of its members and is looking for input by Wednesday, 27 August, to help with their submission. The official consultation ends on 8 September 2025.

Download the consultation questions
For guidance on UK REACH and chemical compliance, visit Sushvin Consultancy

MHRA Clarifies UKCA & CE Mark Rules: What MedTech manufacturers should know

The UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has issued important clarifications on the recognition of CE-marked medical devices and the use of electronic instructions for use (eIFUs) in the UK market. These updates provide guidance for manufacturers navigating post-Brexit regulatory requirements.

Key Updates

1. CE-Marked Devices Still Accepted Until 2030

The MHRA confirms that CE-marked medical devices will continue to be accepted in Great Britain (England, Scotland, and Wales) until at least 30 June 2030, depending on the device type and applicable EU legislation. Devices must comply with relevant EU regulations, including: eIFU rules under Regulation (EU) 2021/2226 or Regulation (EU) No 207/2012. Future EU MDR/IVDR updates (e.g., Regulation 2025/1234, though not explicitly named).

2. UKCA-Marked Devices Must Follow UK-Specific eIFU Rules

For manufacturers going for UKCA marking, the EU’s eIFU regulations do not apply. Instead, they must comply with:
The Medical Devices Regulations 2002 (MDR 2002), Regulation 4J, which permits eIFUs under certain conditions.

3. CE Compliance equals UK Market Access

The MHRA’s statement suggests that CE-marked devices compliant with EU regulations will retain UK market access, even as the EU MDR and IVDR evolve. This aligns with the UK’s approach of "internationally recognising" the CE mark rather than fully diverging.
A separate consultation on unconditional CE recognition is expected later this year which manufacturers should watch closely.

Unresolved Questions

While the update provides clarity, some key issues remain:

Dual Marking (UKCA + CE): Can manufacturers follow one set of eIFU rules for both marks, or must they comply with both EU and UK requirements?
New EU Regulations (e.g., 2025/1234) :The MHRA suggests that following future EU rules will be enough, but clearer confirmation would be helpful.

Final Thoughts

The MHRA’s latest guidance offers stability and predictability for medtech companies, reducing the immediate need to transition to UKCA marking. However, with changes potentially coming, it's important to keep track of compliance.

Need guidance please visit Sushvin
To read more visit

MHRA MedRegs Summer 2025

The MHRA’s Summer 2025 blog outlines sweeping regulatory reforms that directly reflect ABHI’s strategic goals especially around CE mark recognition, international reliance pathways, and digital innovation support.

Highlights:

Reliance pathways now include software & implantable via US, Canada, and Australia approvals

Indefinite CE recognition consultation planned for later this year

These developments reinforce MHRA’s direction toward streamlined approvals, global collaboration, and predictable compliance strategies, a vision that strongly aligns with Sushvin’s regulatory consulting approach.

Read MHRA's Full Update

European Updates

The Future of AI in Healthcare: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Path Forward

The Future of AI in Healthcare: Challenges, Opportunities, and the Path Forward

The European Commission’s recent study on AI deployment in healthcare highlights both the potential and the hurdles faced in integrating AI into clinical practice. Here are the main points:

Potential of AI in transforming healthcare:

This regulatory shift means that MedTech innovators need to develop flexible strategies to meet new compliance demands without losing speed or quality.

Challenges of AI in healthcare

Mantra for Success:

Final Thoughts

Collaboration among policymakers, developers, and healthcare providers is essential. By tackling challenges like regulatory issues, updating infrastructure, and addressing ethical concerns, we can fully harness AI's potential to improve patient care.
For more details on the study,check it out here

A Call for Risk-Based Sampling Under IVDR: Balancing Safety and Sustainability

MedTech Europe has recently proposed a more risk-based approach to sampling under the In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR)
In a recent paper, MedTech Europe suggests moving from the current method of fixed sampling to a risk-based approach for Class B and C devices. Here’s why this change is important for the future of IVDs in Europe.

The Current Challenge: Disproportionate Burden

Under MDCG 2019-13 REV.1, Class B (66% of the IVD market) and Class C (26%) devices require 15% of their technical documentation to be reviewed during certification, which can be reduced to 5%. While this ensures compliance, it has significant downsides:

Under Risk-Based Sampling

MedTech Europe proposes a smarter, more efficient method:

The Benefits of this method

Conclusion:

The IVDR’s goal is to ensuring safe and effective diagnostics. However, a risk-based sampling approach would make compliance more sustainable without sacrificing safety.
By adopting this model, the EU can cut unnecessary bureaucracy, encourage innovation, and ensure access to essential diagnostics.

Need Further Guidance? Contact Sushvin for regulatory services in the UK. Stay informed by subscribing to our monthly newsletter for updates and expert insights
Visit Sushvin Consultancy

Regulatory Strategy for Combination Products: Compliance, FDA vs. EU MDR, and Key Steps 2025 Guide

Combination products, which combine drugs and devices into a single entity play an important role in enhancing healthcare solutions. However, their unique nature presents regulatory challenges, particularly in classification and compliance. The primary obstacle is determining the primary mode of action (PMOA), which dictates whether a product adheres to drug or device regulations.

Regulatory requirements can differ significantly between regions, such as the FDA in the U.S. and the EU MDR.

Regulatory Classification of Combination Products

The classification of combination products is based on their primary mode of action (PMOA), which is the main function providing the intended therapeutic effect. Regulatory authorities like the FDA and EU MDR utilize this principle to determine which set of rules applies - either drug or device regulations.

Importance of Primary Mode of Action

The PMOA is the dominant therapeutic effect through which a combination product fulfils its intended purpose.

Common Challenges and Solutions

Challenges in defining the PMOA stem from the overlapping functionalities of combination products, where both drug and device components significantly contribute.

Reference 1:
Reference 2:

Team NB position paper on Template for NBOp_V4

When submitting a drug-device combination product for market authorization, and the device component lacks CE marking or a valid EU Declaration of Conformity, the manufacturer is required to obtain a Notified Body Opinion.

Final Thought

For those looking to market combination products efficiently, understanding PMOA nuances and effectively demonstrating it is essential.

This foundational understanding of PMOA allows for confident submission planning, whether under FDA rules or the EU MDR framework, each of which treats combination products slightly differently regarding classification and compliance. Grasping these nuances early in the process can facilitate a smoother path to approval and market access.

Visit Sushvin Consultancy to read the complete blog and explore how we support global compliance for combination products.

MedTech Europe’s Call for Coherent Digital Regulation

As digital technologies redefine healthcare delivery, the regulatory frameworks governing them must evolve with equal agility. In its latest position paper dated (28.08.2025), MedTech Europe urges EU policymakers to simplify digital legislation and align it with existing frameworks.

Why This Matters

Digital medical technologies, like AI diagnostics and connected monitoring devices, play a key role in personalized care, early treatment, and remote healthcare. However, the overlapping rules like the Medical Devices Regulation (MDR), In Vitro Diagnostic Regulation (IVDR), and the European Health Data Space (EHDS)—could lead to extra requirements and confusion

Key Recommendations

The position paper outlines several strategic proposals:

The goal is clear which is to create a digital policy framework that is fit for purpose, supports real-world deployment, and strengthens patient care.

Strategic Implications for Industry

For manufacturers, consultants, and digital health developers, this paper signals:

Final Thought

MedTech Europe’s position paper is more than a policy proposal. It’s a strategic roadmap for the future of digital health in Europe. As the EU continues to refine its digital ecosystem, coherent regulation will be key to unlocking innovation, safeguarding patients, and accelerating access to transformative technologies.

Interested in aligning your digital health strategy with EU regulatory trends? Let’s connect.
At Sushvin Consultancy, we help clients navigate the convergence of MDR, IVDR, EHDS, and emerging AI regulations. visit us.

Switzerland Updates


SWISSMEDIC Updates Guidance on Systems and Procedure Packs – Effective August 4, 2025

SWISSMEDIC Updates Guidance on Systems and Procedure Packs – Effective August 4, 2025

SWISSMEDIC has issued a new information sheet that explains the rules for systems and procedure packs in Switzerland. For manufacturers, assemblers, and distributors operating in Switzerland, understanding the specific rules for these combinations known as Systems and Procedure Packs (SPPs) is crucial for compliance and market access.

Key Points

Why It Matters:

Since Switzerland is not part of the EU MDR framework, the compliance rules are different. This guidance helps ensure that medical device combinations are safe, traceable, and meet legal standards in clinical settings.

Key Takeaway for the Industry

The Swissmedic guidance underscores that compliance doesn't stop at the individual device level. Assemblers play a vital role in the supply chain and carry significant responsibility. The requirement for a CH-REP for foreign-assembled SPPs is a critical compliance step specific to the Swiss market that cannot be overlooked.

At Sushvin Consultancy, we assist global manufacturers in understanding Swiss-specific processes, including authorized representation, documentation, and post-market obligations.

For guidance visit us

Switzerland Adopts New EU Rules for Electronic Instructions for Medical Devices

Swissmedic, the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, announced that it will start using the EU's new rules on electronic instructions for use (eIFU). EU Commission Implementing Regulation on the electronic provision of instructions for use (eIFU) for medical devices will bring Switzerland into closer regulatory alignment with the EU MDR. This change will make things easier for manufacturers and provide better, more sustainable information for healthcare workers.

Key Takeaways:

For manufacturers and regulatory teams operating across EU and Swiss markets, this streamlines compliance and supports digital-first strategies in device labeling and post-market documentation.

Next Steps for RA/QA Teams:

This is a strategic shift toward harmonized, tech-enabled compliance across Europe.
To read more visit

At Sushvin Consultancy, we assist global manufacturers in understanding Swiss-specific processes, including authorized representation, documentation, and post-market obligations.
For guidance visit us

USFDA Updates


Understanding FDA’s Small Business Qualification for Medical Device Fees

Understanding FDA’s Small Business Qualification for Medical Device Fees

The FDA has issued its July 2025 guidance to simplify the Small Business Qualification and Determination process under the Medical Device User Fee Amendments (MDUFA). The guidance gives important details for small businesses that want lower fees or waivers for medical device applications and registrations.

Highlight of the guidance

Criteria to be considered as a small business:

The FDA defines a small business based on its sales or gross receipts, with different limits for various benefits:

Key Benefits for Small Businesses

For small medical device companies, qualifying as a small business can lower Premarket Notification (510(k)) fees by up to 80%. This reduction can help budgeting especially for innovative startups in AI diagnostics, software as a medical device (SaMD), and digital therapeutics.

How to apply for U.S. Businesses

Submit a MDUFA Small Business Request (SBR) through the CDRH Portal. Include:

For Foreign Businesses

For complete details, visit

FDA’s New Guidance on PCCPs for AI-Enabled Devices: A Change in Regulatory Approach

The FDA's new guidance on Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP) is an important step in regulating software for artificial intelligence-enabled devices. This guidance helps developers and regulatory teams understand how to manage changes in adaptive algorithms effectively.

What is a PCCP and it’s important?

A PCCP is a proactive regulatory tool that lets manufacturers approve certain software updates like changing algorithms or improving performance during the initial marketing submission.

Key Components of a PCCP

The FDA identifies three main parts of a PCCP:

Strategic Implications for Industry

For manufacturers and consultants, this guidance is not just a procedural update it’s a strategic advantage. It allows for:

Final Thoughts

As AI continues to change healthcare, regulators are adapting as well. The PCCP framework represents a shift towards a more flexible oversight approach that balances innovation with responsibility.

At Sushvin Consultancy, we help clients incorporate PCCPs into their regulatory strategies, ensuring that adaptive AI leads to proactive compliance.

If you need help drafting your PCCP or aligning your AI plans with FDA expectations, let's connect. Visit us
To read more visit

Australian Updates


Australia’s TGA Updates: What Digital Health Innovators Must Know

Australia’s TGA Updates: What Digital Health Innovators Must Know

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has released updated guidance on software-based medical devices an essential read for developers, manufacturers, and regulatory professionals navigating the Australian market.

Software that diagnoses, monitors, prevents, or treats health conditions is considered a medical device under Section 41BD of the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.

What’s Covered:

What’s Not Regulated?

Key Updates from the TGA Guidance:

At Sushvin Consultancy, we specialize in helping digital health innovators navigate SaMD classification, clinical validation, and global compliance from TGA to MDR and FDA.

Visit us
Read the full guidance

TGA Mandates Adverse Event Reporting by Healthcare Facilities: A New Standard for Device Vigilance

Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has introduced mandatory reporting requirements for medical device adverse events. The new guidance mandates all public, private, and day hospital facilities to must report medical device adverse events.

Key Legislative Details

What Must Be Reported

How to Report

Reports are submitted via the ASDER system (Adverse Signal Detection and Event Reporting), which is distinct from the IRIS system used by sponsors and professionals.

Timeframes:

Reports must include:

Data Integration & Impact

The ASDER system enables early signal detection and trend analysis, complementing voluntary reports from IRIS.

Final Thoughts

The TGA’s move toward mandatory adverse event reporting by healthcare facilities reflects a global trend: regulators are demanding more proactive, real-world vigilance. For device manufacturers, sponsors, and hospitals, this is a call to strengthen collaboration and transparency.

At Sushvin Consultancy, we’re here to help clients navigate this transition with clarity, confidence, and compliance.

Need help aligning your facility’s reporting systems with TGA expectations? Let’s connect. Visit us
To read more visit

ISO Updates

ISO 9001:2026 Is Coming – Time to Future-Proof Your QMS!

ISO Standards Update – August 2025

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) is strengthening global safety and innovation through ongoing standardization efforts.

The latest ISO bulletin (July 1–August 1, 2025) outlines key movements in international standards applicable to medical devices and biological evaluation:

Highlights include:

These developments are crucial for manufacturers, quality consultants, and regulatory professionals navigating MDR, IVDR, and ISO 10993 compliance.

Explore our services
To read more visit

South Africa Updates

SAHPRA Launches Engagement Portal: Simplifying Variation Submissions and Fees
August 2025 Update

SAHPRA Launches Engagement Portal: Simplifying Variation Submissions and Fees August 2025 Update

The South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) has officially rolled out its Engagement Portal, introducing a transparent fee calculation system and streamlined submission process for variations.

Key Highlights

Interim Fee Calculation Modules
Reduced fees for bundled submissions are now available, saving costs for applicants.
Submission Limits for Variations

To make processing easier, SAHPRA has set maximum limits for submissions:

Bundled Submissions for Cost Efficiency
Transition Period

The new fee module will be effective from 22 August 2025.
SAHPRA’s Finance Unit will automatically adjust submissions made between 1 April and 22 August 2025—no need for applicants to reach out.

Read the full update

Final Thoughts

SAHPRA’s new Engagement Portal represents an important step towards clearer and more efficient regulatory submissions. Companies should quickly adapt to take advantage of cost-saving opportunities while ensuring compliance.

Sushvin Provides UK Responsible Person (UK RP) Services

Are you a legal medical device/IVD manufacturer located outside the UK and would like to market your product in the UK, then you will require a UK responsible person who will act on behalf of the manufacturer to ensure all the responsibilities detailed within the updated UK MDR 2002 regulations are met.

As a legal manufacturer, organisations will have to register their devices prior to be placed on the UK market.

If you need UK Responsible Person (UK RP) services, please contact SUSHVIN for more information.

If you are planning to market your product in the EU and if you require PRRC (Person Responsible for Regulatory Compliance), we have a team of experienced regulatory professionals who can help you assist with PRRC services and get you regulatory compliant as per MDR 2017/745 and IVDR 2017/746
If you need PRRC Services, please contact SUSHVIN for more information.